You must be logged in to post

Search Forums:


 






Say Hello to America's Next President . . . I Hope

UserPost

9:26 pm
January 29, 2010


mdr

posts 172

Gary E. Johnson

**LINK**

Your athletic, Mount Everest climbing, "antiwar, anti-Fed, pro-personal liberties, slash-government-spending candidate" for president.

This man gets my vote.

"Don't believe in the two big G's"

9:31 pm
January 29, 2010


mdr

posts 172

Oh and this is a must read as well, it's older but very well written and an awesome introduction to Gary:

**LINK**

"Don't believe in the two big G's"

5:21 pm
February 10, 2010


RestrictedAccess

posts 28

Wow…his stances on drugs and prostitution are almost identical to mine. I like his idea on the voucher system, too. I have to wonder about his other stances though. Is there a website that has his opinions and past political decisions handy? I don't know if ontheissues.org has them in their database.

I submit to you, sir, that there is no God, because everything came from pudding.

11:13 pm
February 10, 2010


mdr

posts 172

RestrictedAccess said:

Wow…his stances on drugs and prostitution are almost identical to mine. I like his idea on the voucher system, too. I have to wonder about his other stances though. Is there a website that has his opinions and past political decisions handy? I don't know if ontheissues.org has them in their database.


http://ouramericainitiative.com/

That's his own organization that he's been building. If you go there you will find 99% of his stances on things.

"Don't believe in the two big G's"

7:14 am
February 11, 2010


RestrictedAccess

posts 28

Well, I did find out quite a lot, and nothing that I find myself objecting to. His "civil liberties" section left me wanting, however. It's centered mostly on drugs. What of gay marriage? Abortion? Repealing DOMA and DADT? I couldn't access the constitution section. My NoScript add-on must be going haywire.

I imagine more will come out closer to 2012, assuming he decides to run. He seems to have a common sense approach to just about everything, and best of all, he's not a career politician. He's a business man and former governor who did a lot to help his state.

I submit to you, sir, that there is no God, because everything came from pudding.

10:22 am
February 11, 2010


mdr

posts 172

What I probably like best about him? When he talks about the actions he's going to take with voters and people in the community, he doesn't bring up his "principles" that are driving him. He talks about the problem and how his actions are fixing or going to fix it. I never thought of it before but that is how Libertarian statesmen need to REACH the people, this is what Republicans and Democrats have been doing for YEARS. It's the way people think. Problem + Solution = Success. Whether there is success or not, people still like to hear it though they may be less likely to listen if you haven't been successful in the past. You average person on the street is too busy with their own life to listen to messages, that is why, though we are still a heavily religious nation, people hate being preached to by proselytes. This is what Libertarian Statesmen MUST do:

1. Explain the problem
2. Explain the non-government solution
3. Engage the solution

People already KNOW that it is a government-free or freeing solution, they do NOT need to be told, use words like "grass-roots" and "community action". If the solutions are successful, the next time these people hear of government-free solutions, they will be MUCH more prone to hearing it, more excitable. This is how we win not only MINDS but movements, by successful solution after successful solution and by not encouraging the adoption of our "labels" we encourage other movements and groups to adopt our ideas and ideals. Isn't that what it's all about?

It seems that nowadays both major parties are infused with big government thinking, what's stopping us from changing that? What's stopping us from infusing back into those major parties our thinking? We do it by being successful and popular. I believe we have the successful thing down, small government WORKS, we know that, we just have to work on the popular part. . . Gary Johnson appears to be good at this.

"Don't believe in the two big G's"

3:04 pm
February 13, 2010


RestrictedAccess

posts 28

Post edited 3:05 pm – February 13, 2010 by RestrictedAccess


I found a more in depth list of Gary's issues, but whether the site is official or not, I don't know: http://johnsonforamerica.com/issues.php

I think I'm going to cry. I've never agreed this much with a politician's views. Not even when I supported Ron Paul.
Here's some of my favorites:

"Protecting the Unborn
While Gary himself is personally pro-choice up until the point of fetal viability, he understands the proper role of government, and would return the abortion issue back to the 50 states to decide, as the US Constitution mandates. In order to put the abortion issue back under the proper jurisdiction, Gary would nominate judges who adhere to the original intent of the Constitution, so that Roe v. Wade could be overturned. "

"LGBT Issues
Gary personally believes that marriage is between one man and one woman. He also understands that federalism is the most reasonable and Constitutional approach to the marriage issue, and that the 50 states should be free to define marriage for themselves. Gary recognizes that we are mature enough as a nation to accept people of all different backgrounds and persuasions, and believes that both heterosexuals and open homosexuals who wish to serve their country in the armed forces ought to be permitted to do so. "

"New Energy Sources
Gary believes that the government ought to allow new exploration and development of the full spectrum of promising energy resources. He also supports federal tax breaks for companies who want to develop new sources of energy, and believes that free market forces must come into play to reduce energy costs and increase the efficiency with which energy is delivered. "

I submit to you, sir, that there is no God, because everything came from pudding.

8:08 pm
February 13, 2010


mdr

posts 172

I don't think that it will be possible to elect a president who is not a member of the two major parties, I think a win for classical liberals within a break with the Republicans would be just the ticket to get the GOP grounded back in liberty.

Who knows, perhaps in four years time the Democrats will be primed for a classic liberal, perhaps Gary. . . stranger things have happened. I could see him focusing on the social issues, the backlash against the religious right could end up being the BEST thing to ever happen to the cause of liberty.

Teddy Roosevelt's Progressive movement did this exact thing in the opposite direction for the Democrats and "Progressives" (socialists), he broke the Progressives from the conservative Republicans, splitting it in half. When the Democrats came to their "senses" and began to cater to the socialists they became an unstoppable force.

Can you see it now? Here's the slogan, "Returning Jefferson's Party to Jeffersonian Thinking".

Perhaps I'm thinking way too far ahead? Maybe twenty or thirty years too far ahead. . .

"Don't believe in the two big G's"



About the The Libertarian Atheist forum

Most Users Ever Online:

13


Currently Online:

doctom

3 Guests

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 11

Topics: 48

Posts: 346

Membership:

There are 48 Members

There has been 1 Guest

There is 1 Admin

There are 2 Moderators

Top Posters:

RestrictedAccess – 28

Kultabugi – 13

upgrade01a – 12

Warren Dew – 12

Homunclus – 11

Aught3 – 11

Administrators: mdr (172 Posts)

Moderators: keddaw (33 Posts), jeffersonianideal (9 Posts)