You must be logged in to post

Search Forums:


 






What is it hard to believe in god?

UserPost

11:15 pm
August 23, 2009


Daystars

posts 10

Post edited 11:24 pm – August 23, 2009 by Daystars



How come people have such a hard time believing in god? Since you can not see the almighty? That people don't raise from the dead anymore?


It aggravates me to no end. That we as a people continually act under the precepts of ignorance.  Are we as a people really so intelligent to think that we have all of the answers? Even in this age of information, we are still ignorant. The wise man admits that he is ignorant.  Our limited perceptions can not accept or even possible encapsulate what god is or is not.  We have that which has been handed down for thousands of years. In this sanctified book, we find the grounds to live good and wholesome lives.  We are given the promise of eternal life and salvation. Salvation from the human condition, from our flesh and our minds.  For those who would say that we don't need salvation. Think about it. In the two thousand years since Christ walked this earth. We have killed, murdered, raped and continued to commit sins.  We commit the same sins in the newest ways.  Sometimes our moral expediency is to do so in the name of Christ.  How can we be so ignorant? How can we honestly believe that we are acting in "GODS" word?


The lord and savior preached of peace.  He commands us to love the unloved and to love all others as ourselves.  Yet, there are so many of you that argue against his followers because of atrocities committed in the name of Religion. Religion is and always will be a construct of man.  Which means it is a construct of you. It is that contract which your parents, parents adhered too and you now adamantly rebel against.  For that concept that life has no meaning, that all of this is so random?  That life will just occur in the universe and be intelligent?  Nihilism is that believe that life has no meaning and that all morals are just created by man.  If that is truly your calling, then why continue to struggle in this world? In this world of the flesh which promises only pain and suffering. Yes, for that is the life in the flesh it is a world of pain.  Pain outweighs and will continue to outweigh happiness. Only through accepting our lord and savior can we be truly happy.  By giving it all back to God and putting on his shoulders.  Call him what you will, he is a big god.


What is more he created each of us in the mold he wanted us to follow.  God created atheists in order to test the faithful. He wants us to come to him willingly. Not because he forced us to believe but to come in faith. To trust his word and his commandments, it was his breath that poured life into the universe. Not just one part of it but the entire universe. Some may ask if god is infinitely good and benevolent why he allows war and famine.  It is because he promised man freewill. He enabled us to act as we choose. Whether or not we commit evils against each other? That is not god's will that is our will.  Others may argue that he punishes unfairly? But our parents punish us when we are young. And society punishes when we are old. Not out of spite or malice, but with the hope it will enable us to lead more meaningful lives.  But Humans in our foolish arrogance and pride, think to ignore the lessons we are taught.


Fact is science can not disprove anything. It can only be used to prove that which can be observed.  Even within the natural world and within science. There are contradictions that exist. Dichotomies that should not be, yet there they are.  So long as possibilities exist then there must exist that there is indeed GOD.  My god created the universe and man's science can only explain it with in the finite bounds that it applies. We can not quantify that which is unknown or unknowable.  It could be argued that perception creates reality.

If perception creates reality then the people that believe in some form of divinity, are correct. Atheist's become incorrect as you are outnumbered.  And agnostics just make the entire matter worse. Since they have not an clue what to believe, in that regards Atheists at least make the choice to believe in nothing. In conclusion I honestly believe this is not the time to be an end walker. Admit your ignorance and find something to follow.

11:42 pm
August 23, 2009


mdr

posts 172

I prefer to work under the precepts of what knowledge I do have, I accept what I do not know as being nigh on infinite.  In that infinite, though, I prefer not to insert my foot, like you did with your mouth (keyboard?) here.  I tread on what ground that I can see, if somebody tells me there is a bridge where I see none, I would call him a fool and tell him to enjoy his fall.


I will deny all assertions that can't be proved, as I make none, I easily avoid being a hypocrite.  It is true that science cannot disprove anything but I prefer to avoid anything that can't be proved, I will go further and ask anyone that would wish me to accept their assertions to prove it.


One more thing:


Atheism != Nihilism


I see a lot of beauty in the world.  I see my purpose in life being to leave the world a slightly better place had I never lived in it.


(BTW, nice job skating the metaphysical with that "quantify that which is unknown or unknowable", this is the equivalent to leaving a flaming bag of dogshit on the front doorstep, I won't bother putting it out with my foot, **pulls out extinguisher**)

"Don't believe in the two big G's"

7:44 pm
August 27, 2009


zeroverse

Boulder, CO

posts 8

I have a "hard time believing in god" for the same reasons that I have a hard time believing in unicorns.

Neither myth is supported by any evidence.

That said, I think unicorns could totally be engineered by a creative genetic scientist!

12:06 am
August 28, 2009


Daystars

posts 10

zeroverse said:

I have a "hard time believing in god" for the same reasons that I have a hard time believing in unicorns.

Neither myth is supported by any evidence.

That said, I think unicorns could totally be engineered by a creative genetic scientist!


See it seems to me that most people find it easier to accept those things they can touch, see, smell and hear. Otherwise it must not exist. Or those things that are proven through science. Yet it seems that time and time again. When something that comes that is sufficiently advanced or unknown. We apply other terms to it.  Can you answer why life is on this planet? Can you answer where the universe comes from? And if the big bang is true, where did the matter and mass come from in the first place. These are all questions that can not at this time be answered. I choose to believe in a greater intelligent power. Which seems more rational than accepting that life is some type of fluke.

3:53 am
August 28, 2009


zeroverse

Boulder, CO

posts 8

Daystars said:

See it seems to me that most people find it easier to accept those things they can touch, see, smell and hear. Otherwise it must not exist. Or those things that are proven through science. Yet it seems that time and time again. When something that comes that is sufficiently advanced or unknown. We apply other terms to it.  Can you answer why life is on this planet? Can you answer where the universe comes from? And if the big bang is true, where did the matter and mass come from in the first place. These are all questions that can not at this time be answered. I choose to believe in a greater intelligent power. Which seems more rational than accepting that life is some type of fluke.

Most of the evidence suggests that there is life on this planet because of evolution: http://evolution.berkeley.edu/…..opic_id=46

Most astrophysists believe that this universe began with a big bang, as you noted: http://www.talkorigins.org/faq…..gbang.html

Your question about where the matter and mass came from to cause the big bang…is a good one. But the answer isn't "God." Because if it were "God" then how did he get there? If you believe the universe is so complex that only a supreme being could have created it…then something even more supreme had to create the universe's creator first, and something more supreme had to create that supreme being, and so on…ad infinitum.

Cosmologists (and I) continue to wonder about and investigate the very nature of the universe and it's origin. Just in the last few decades we've discovered and unravelled many mysteries (including dark matter and dark energy)…and with bigger telescopes and better technology, we are bound to unravel even more of the universe's mysteries.  Just because we don't understand something NOW, doesn't mean "God did it." It's such a cop out to relegate everything we humans don't understand (yet) to "God."

Can't we just say "We don't know yet"?

Imagine centuries ago when people contracted unexplained illnesses if we just said, "Oh well, we can't possibly understand why this person is getting sick…it must be God's will." Imagine if all people just accepted that people got sick and died and believed there was nothing we could do about it. Imagine if someone didn't invent the microscope, if someone didn't discover anticeptics, if we abandoned the pursuit of modern medicine…imagine what a dark, dire world we would live in…if we just said "God did it."

Fortunately, we don't live in that world. Scientist that shun the "God did it" explaination are constantly helping all of us live healthier, more enlightened lives by solving complex questions and inventing new ways to unravel the universes mysteries.

Perhaps one day, scientists will also answer the questions that you seek. But in the meantime…wouldn't it be smarter to reserve your judgement since right now you have no evidence to support a "greater intelligent power"?

2:22 am
August 29, 2009


mdr

posts 172

Daystars said:

When something that comes that is sufficiently advanced or unknown. We apply other terms to it.  Can you answer why life is on this planet? Can you answer where the universe comes from? And if the big bang is true, where did the matter and mass come from in the first place.


These are all reasonable questions though hardly sufficient for anything but (as Dawkins put it) a god of gaps.  God is the putty and spackle of history, truth.  Thus far, almost every argument for a spackle god, has been replaced with a much more evidence-supported, adequate and logical explanation.  For the most part, these explanations have floods of evidence and proof and very little to say that they are inaccurate.


In most other parts of life, we will use logical and reasoned evidence for decisions that we make (when driving we stop at stop signs and scan for oncoming traffic, if we see evidence that a vehicle is coming at a certain rate, we will wait to cross), I see no reason to stop using evidence at the biggest most important questions.


I think I have told you before (OTP), that everybody uses faith in some respect in their life, we are human, this is expected.  There is no logical reason for me to devote my life to one woman, but I look into her eyes and logic gets mangled.  Happiness is purely illogical, but the source of the universe should be logical (like the rest of the universe we see, as finite as our perceptions may be).

"Don't believe in the two big G's"

12:36 am
September 30, 2009


RestrictedAccess

posts 28

 I believe those who are agnostic are the ONLY ones admitting their ignorance. In admitting my ignorance I've come to terms with the fact that I don't know, and probably never will know, if gods exist. However, I've lived my life for almost a decade quite well without the belief in a god, and see no real reason to believe in one.

I submit to you, sir, that there is no God, because everything came from pudding.

12:55 pm
October 5, 2009


mdr

posts 172

Well the truth is that everyone is agnostic, I think it safe to say that were any of us confronted with someone claiming to TRULY know faith not withstanding, we would call them insane.  When I say that I'm atheist, I mean it insofar as it pertains to any current assertions of who god might be.  I would be the last to doubt anything unknown, though failing proof, I shall live my life without knowing but be as averse to it as anything else unknown.


I'm not labelled atheistic because it is important to me, it's because it is important to everyone else, it seems.  That is to say, if I were bald, I wouldn't need to be labeled bald if everyone else didn't have hair. . .

"Don't believe in the two big G's"

11:10 pm
October 11, 2009


Aught3

posts 11

Post edited 11:13 pm – October 11, 2009 by Aught3


While I appreciate your passion for the subject, Daystars, you seem to make some odd arguments. I hope you don't mind if I question your reasoning a bit. The first thing that you say is that we, as a people, don't know everything and that a wise man is one who knows what he doesn't know. I wholeheartedly agree, but you don't seem to follow your own advice. Instead of admitting that you don't know whether or not a god exists you go on to assume that God exists, he put atheists on the Earth to test faith, and you suggest you know what God wants of us. Which is it? Either we can say nothing about God admitting we are ignorant, or God can learned about and understood by people willing to seek him out.


You then ask why a non-believer would want to exist in this vale of tears we call life. The answer to this is quite obvious; a non-believer thinks that this life, as awful as it is, is all they get. There is no afterlife or re-birth for them to try again and if we only get one life then it is infinitely more valuable than if it was the first of many. I would also turn this question around and ask you, why do you remain in this vale of tears? If you have another life, that's even better than this one, waiting for you why aren't you trying to get to it sooner?


Next you say:

"Some may ask if god is infinitely good and benevolent why he allows war and famine.  It is because he promised man freewill. He enabled us to act as we choose."

Freewill answers the challenge of war i.e. it is man (usually anyway Wink) who makes war against one another but freewill fails completely to provide a satisfactory reason for the existence of famine. Famine is not caused by the choices humans make, it is more often to do with a crop failure due to unpredictable weather, climate change, or what are called acts of God. If God knows enough to realise the famine is occurring and is powerful enough to stop it and yet he does not, we must conclude that God wants the famine to occur. This is not the type of God I would put my faith in.


Finally, I'll answer a couple of the scientific challenges you raise. The first is that of disproof, science can a routinely does disprove things. This is the nature of hypothesis testing where a hypothesis is specifically formulated (the null hypothesis) in order to be disproved. The second challenge is to ask where did all the matter and mass in the universe come from. The answer lies in Einstein's famous equation E=mc² this equation tells us that energy can be converted into mass, it just takes a heck of a lot of energy to do it. Thirdly, you bring up the idea of contradictions in science, I'm afraid I can't think of any off the top of my head – do you have a particular example?


Btw, this is my first post so Hi!


Edit: got rid of the silly quote.


12:15 am
October 12, 2009


mdr

posts 172

Welcome to our forums Aught3!


Those are some very valid points, my friend, I'm rather ashamed that I hadn't used the "why don't you end your life if the next one is so much better?" argument.  'Noice!'


I think the problem of a God is one of rather simplistic utility, isn't it?  Occam's Razor and all that (ironic that Daystars would probably appreciate Brother William's writing far more than either you or I).  Why replace a difficult question, such as the existence and creation of the universe, with one at least as if not more complicated, such as the existence and creation of a god?


I look forward to your contributions!

"Don't believe in the two big G's"

6:09 pm
October 17, 2009


Homunclus

posts 11

Post edited 6:10 pm – October 17, 2009 by Homunclus


Aught3 said:


but freewill fails completely to provide a satisfactory reason for the existence of famine. Famine is not caused by the choices humans make, it is more often to do with a crop failure due to unpredictable weather, climate change, or what are called acts of God.


This is not exactly true. A lot of famine is the consequence of wars and politics. At this point our food production should be about enough to properly feed everyone, and yet hunger still exists.


On the other hand, lack of productivity is often caused by improper use of the land (to much pesticides, overproduction, mono culture…)

7:12 pm
October 17, 2009


Aught3

posts 11

Although famine is often the result of multiple causes you can't deny that climate, weather, and unpredictable 'acts of god' exacerbate the problem.


Locusts and drought in Niger

Drought in Afghanistan

Drought in Ethiopia

Floods in North Korea

Comet impact!


What do these natural disaters have to do with free will?

11:18 pm
October 17, 2009


mdr

posts 172

Homunclus said:

Post edited 6:10 pm – October 17, 2009 by Homunclus


Aught3 said:


but freewill fails completely to provide a satisfactory reason for the existence of famine. Famine is not caused by the choices humans make, it is more often to do with a crop failure due to unpredictable weather, climate change, or what are called acts of God.


This is not exactly true. A lot of famine is the consequence of wars and politics. At this point our food production should be about enough to properly feed everyone, and yet hunger still exists.


On the other hand, lack of productivity is often caused by improper use of the land (to much pesticides, overproduction, mono culture…)


I have to go with Aught3 here, although there IS a lot of famine due to war and politics, the majority of famine, I believe usually has a natural basis.  Wars probably don't help it and I'm sure that famine starts a lot of wars in fact.


But this is getting the point off track, even if most famine was caused by war and politics, there is famine based on nature, which refers us back to "why would god allow natural famine to occur?"  It is evil and it has nothing to do with free will, withstanding politically or war manifested famines.

"Don't believe in the two big G's"

3:17 am
October 18, 2009


Homunclus

posts 11

Well, certainly. I said that a lot of famine is caused by  human factors not all of it. One could argue over the percentages (for example of the examples Aught3 offered, which ones have been enhanced by global warming?) but that is an issue to other topic…

11:36 am
October 18, 2009


mdr

posts 172

Homunclus said:

Well, certainly. I said that a lot of famine is caused by  human factors not all of it. One could argue over the percentages (for example of the examples Aught3 offered, which ones have been enhanced by global warming?) but that is an issue to other topic…


And he never said that there weren't a lot caused by humans.  Besides, it has NOTHING to do with the topic.


Please stay ON TOPIC in any further replies to anyone.  Thank you.

"Don't believe in the two big G's"

7:23 pm
October 18, 2009


Aught3

posts 11

Well, certainly. I said that a lot of famine is caused by  human factors not all of it. One could argue over the percentages (for example of the examples Aught3 offered, which ones have been enhanced by global warming?) but that is an issue to other topic…

Perhaps I wasn't totally clear, all I meant was that human free will couldn't account for all famine in the world.


Incidentally, I thought since Daystars was he a moderator he'd be around more often, but I guess he's busy?

1:17 am
October 19, 2009


mdr

posts 172

Daystars is a close friend of mine, as of the moment, there's not a whole lot of need for active moderation outside of what I can bring to the table.  This post was one of the very first ones in the forum, his attention is diverted as of the moment.


All that being said, I'll ring him up and let him know that he'd been asked upon.  I don't know how much time he'll have to come around any time soon.

"Don't believe in the two big G's"

7:29 pm
December 1, 2009


Socialistarian

posts 8


Daystars said:

Post edited 11:24 pm – August 23, 2009 by Daystars


How come people have such a hard time believing in god? Since you can not see the almighty? That people don't raise from the dead anymore?


How come you have such an easy time believing in god?

Okay That wasn't fair. Undoubtedly you put a lot of thought into you faith. In fact, to call it simply faith would be misleading wouldn't it? Because you also put logic and consideration into it, correct?

Well guess what, so do I. The fact that people don't (and never did) raise from the dead has nothing to do with it.

It aggravates me to no end. That we as a people continually act under the precepts of ignorance.  Are we as a people really so intelligent to think that we have all of the answers? Even in this age of information, we are still ignorant. The wise man admits that he is ignorant.  Our limited perceptions can not accept or even possible encapsulate what god is or is not.  We have that which has been handed down for thousands of years. In this sanctified book, we find the grounds to live good and wholesome lives.  We are given the promise of eternal life and salvation. Salvation from the human condition, from our flesh and our minds.

I find it hilarious that you claim WE are ignorant for assuming we know for a fact god doesn't exist when you're making an equally blind assumption that he does. "Oh wait!" I hear you cry! "Mine is not a blind assumption because it is based on a book that has been around for two thousand years!"

Well, I got news for you. There are Hindu texts a lot older than that, so surely using your logic they must be more correct than the bible right? Or what about the Ancient Egyptian gods? Why do you worship Jehovah and not Apophis?

The feelings you have towards them are the exact same I have towards the Bible – worthless pieces of shit written by crazy old men living in caves. That somehow, inexplicably have fooled billions of people down the years.  And the feelings you probably have towards Hindus are ones I have towards people of your faith – nice people, but misguided fools.

For those who would say that we don't need salvation. Think about it. In the two thousand years since Christ walked this earth. We have killed, murdered, raped and continued to commit sins.  We commit the same sins in the newest ways.  Sometimes our moral expediency is to do so in the name of Christ.  How can we be so ignorant? How can we honestly believe that we are acting in "GODS" word?

You seem to be claiming that because the human race has had a violent past that this is not only proof of our need of salvation, but that it validates you faith in Jesus. This is bull.

Firstly, I could pick any historical religious figure and do what you just did.
"We have killed, murdered, raped and continued to commit sins since Muhammad (peace be upon him) walked the earth. Therefore Islam is the one a true religion."
"We have killed, murdered, raped and continued to give into desire since Buddha walked the earth. Therefore Buddhism is the only true path to Nirvana."
See what I mean?

Secondly, the human race "killed, murdered & raped" for the 150 thousand years prior to Christ's supposed visit? So what exactly does that prove? Except that we evolved from primates who "killed, murdered & raped" and in turn evolved from mammals that "killed, murdered & raped".

Sometimes our moral expediency is to do so in the name of Christ.  How can we be so ignorant? How can we honestly believe that we are acting in "GODS" word?

You realise your complaining about other Christians to a forum full of Atheists right…? But never-the-less I believe I have an answer for you. People commit horrible acts in the name of God because they need to validate their actions. Exactly like people committing good acts need to. 

For that concept that life has no meaning, that all of this is so random?  That life will just occur in the universe and be intelligent?  Nihilism is that believe that life has no meaning and that all morals are just created by man.  If that is truly your calling, then why continue to struggle in this world? In this world of the flesh which promises only pain and suffering. Yes, for that is the life in the flesh it is a world of pain.  Pain outweighs and will continue to outweigh happiness.

As had already been stated: Nihilism is VERY different from Atheism. Oh, and the point about 'why don't you just kill yourself" I find pretty fucked up. It also shows your naivety fairly well I feel. I LOVE life. More than you ever could because I believe it is the only one I get, so I'm going to live it to the fullest. Suffering and happiness come in equal measure I think, and you cannot have one without the other. But even at my lowest point I would never consider suicide. It would be a waste of the miracle that is life in this miracle-less universe.

On the flip-side, why don't you just kill yourself so you could be with God. Oh, I know suicide is a sin, but then God forgives doesn't he? You could be with him tomorrow. Why don't you do it?

Only through accepting our lord and savior can we be truly happy.  By giving it all back to God and putting on his shoulders.  Call him what you will, he is a big god.

So only Christians are 'truly' happy? Do you have any idea how arrogant and preposterous that makes you sound? So the four-point-something BILLION people who don't believe in your personal adult fair tale are only, what? Marginally happy? Partly Happy?

Are are we all actually depressed it's just nobody has told us?

What is more he created each of us in the mold he wanted us to follow.  God created atheists in order to test the faithful. He wants us to come to him willingly. Not because he forced us to believe but to come in faith. To trust his word and his commandments, it was his breath that poured life into the universe. Not just one part of it but the entire universe.

What?!? God created Atheists to test the faithful? So you're telling me that God created me the way I am so I'd knock dents in your personal faith? Oh wait! "Not because he forced us to believe but to come in faith." So he doesn't want to force you to believe but he "creates Atheists." So how does he do that without forcing us not to believe? So, here I am, without the supposedly sacred Freewill that you seem to be aloud testing your faith. That's all fine and well, but what about my soul? I go to Hell just 'cause God wanted a few Atheists running about causing trouble for the faithful. Your God sounds like a bit of a dick to me.

Some may ask if god is infinitely good and benevolent why he allows war and famine.  It is because he promised man freewill. He enabled us to act as we choose. Whether or not we commit evils against each other? That is not god's will that is our will.  Others may argue that he punishes unfairly? But our parents punish us when we are young. And society punishes when we are old. Not out of spite or malice, but with the hope it will enable us to lead more meaningful lives.

I doubt you'll find anyone on here that asks that question. Because as far as we're concerned there is no God to allow anything. But what does freewill have to do with famine? Famine is usually caused by the actions of nature (for you read God) not the actions of man.

But Humans in our foolish arrogance and pride, think to ignore the lessons we are taught.

Maybe the reasons that Theists need to believe in a fairy tale type superpower in the sky is because your constantly putting humans down. Yes, we're flawed, but fuck sake, we're a lot better than religion makes us out to be.

Fact is science can not disprove anything. It can only be used to prove that which can be observed.  Even within the natural world and within science. There are contradictions that exist. Dichotomies that should not be, yet there they are.  So long as possibilities exist then there must exist that there is indeed GOD.  My god created the universe and man's science can only explain it with in the finite bounds that it applies. We can not quantify that which is unknown or unknowable.  It could be argued that perception creates reality.

The argument that because science doesn't know everything therefore God exists is VERY flawed logic. Using this logic then the likelihood of God existing 1000yrs ago was greater and his likelihood of him existing 1000yrs from now would be less so. This is known as "God of the gaps" theory amongst theologians. And they stay clear of it. So should you.

But for a moment let's  say that a god-like being (ie. a supernatural creator of existence) does exist. How in the name of the flying spaghetti monster DO YOU KNOW IT IS YOUR GOD? You believe what you believe (I'm assuming here) because that is what your parents taught you to believe. Why are you so sure its the Christian god that exists?

Is it that feeling you get inside when you commune with God? That euphoria that builds up first inside your stomach and makes it way towards you heart? Is that how you KNOW without a single shadow of a doubt that YOU'RE right and everyone else is wrong?

What? You don't think I use to get that when I believed? You don't think the Muslims, Hindus et all get that too? It's a chemical reaction inside your brain, that's all.

If perception creates reality then the people that believe in some form of divinity, are correct. Atheist's become incorrect as you are outnumbered.  And agnostics just make the entire matter worse. Since they have not an clue what to believe, in that regards Atheists at least make the choice to believe in nothing.

Where did people reach the ridiculous conclusion that perception creates reality? I hope you realise that's blasphemous. For not only are you suggesting the moment that Atheists outnumber Theists then we'll cause God to cease to exist your implying that it was Theists in the first place who created God.

In conclusion I honestly believe this is not the time to be an end walker. Admit your ignorance and find something to follow.

Yeah, well I'm not going to take much stock in the beliefs of someone who thinks that by creating a creator your actually answering the question of how did existence come into being instead of raising more of them (let alone someone who believes 'perception creates reality'). And stop calling us ignorant. It really makes you look like a festering hypocrite.

9:15 pm
December 1, 2009


mdr

posts 172

Oh GOD!!  LMAO, I love you already Socialistarian!  I think we're going to have a LOT of fun together on this forum. . .  Let me give Daystars a call, he's going to love responding!!

"Don't believe in the two big G's"

10:13 pm
December 1, 2009


Daystars

posts 10

Post edited 11:26 pm – December 1, 2009 by Daystars


Socialistarian said:


How come you have such an easy time believing in god?

Okay That wasn't fair. Undoubtedly you put a lot of thought into you faith. In fact, to call it simply faith would be misleading wouldn't it? Because you also put logic and consideration into it, correct?

Well guess what, so do I. The fact that people don't (and never did) raise from the dead has nothing to do with it.

When dealing with faith there is no logic and or consideration. If it were possible to make a logical choice based on fact and experience. Then there would simply be no need for faith. Since ample evidence and proof would be there. Now consideration is a different story.  And I don't have an easy time believing in the "Christian God", mainly because the entire concept is ludicrous and laudable at best. 


I find it hilarious that you claim WE are ignorant for assuming we know for a fact god doesn't exist when you're making an equally blind assumption that he does. "Oh wait!" I hear you cry! "Mine is not a blind assumption because it is based on a book that has been around for two thousand years!"

Well, I got news for you. There are Hindu texts a lot older than that, so surely using your logic they must be more correct than the bible right? Or what about the Ancient Egyptian gods? Why do you worship Jehovah and not Apophis?

The feelings you have towards them are the exact same I have towards the Bible – worthless pieces of shit written by crazy old men living in caves. That somehow, inexplicably have fooled billions of people down the years.  And the feelings you probably have towards Hindus are ones I have towards people of your faith – nice people, but misguided fools

This entire segment of your response is acting under the assumption that I was referring to a Judeo-Christian text. Now I will be the first to agree that the common response of Christians to other religions. Even those that are older including Gnostic religions is with disdain. Furthermore ignorance is the state of not knowing.  Atheists and those of the faith are equally as ignorant since no-one knows the answer. As to the reason more people don't worship Egyptian Gods or the Hindu gods simply put they weren't the winners.  And to set you straight on one point. I do not think anyone is a nice misguided fool. I do believe people make poor decisions because they have insufficient information or the lack of desire to do better.


You seem to be claiming that because the human race has had a violent past that this is not only proof of our need of salvation, but that it validates you faith in Jesus. This is bull.

Firstly, I could pick any historical religious figure and do what you just did. 
"We have killed, murdered, raped and continued to commit sins since Muhammad (peace be upon him) walked the earth. Therefore Islam is the one a true religion." 
"We have killed, murdered, raped and continued to give into desire since Buddha walked the earth. Therefore Buddhism is the only true path to Nirvana." 
See what I mean?

Secondly, the human race "killed, murdered & raped" for the 150 thousand years prior to Christ's supposed visit? So what exactly does that prove? Except that we evolved from primates who "killed, murdered & raped" and in turn evolved from mammals that "killed, murdered & raped".

Excellent point on this one.  Pick your prophet and you can most definitely say people continued to act like people.  That particular statement was more of a jab at Christians / Muslims than anything.  Since according to the 4 Canonical Gospels, followers of Christ are supposed to give up all ties beyond the faith.  Also the faithful are supposed to attempt to live outside of sin. Which is neither here nor there.  As to animals including primates, as far as I know they do not commit murder. Yes they kill in order to eat, that is natural order though. Rape is a touchy subject though, since in nature those that mate are the dominants. So I am not certain that a primate is capable of rape as we know it. 


You realise your complaining about other Christians to a forum full of Atheists right…? But never-the-less I believe I have an answer for you. People commit horrible acts in the name of God because they need to validate their actions. Exactly like people committing good acts need to.

Yes I was very well of what I had written and have my reason for doing so.  And your are incorrect they don't need to validate their actions. It is moral expediency plain and simple. The current system of rules does not allow me to take this course of action. So if I blame a greater power then it is okay and the blame is now shifted to that greater power. In psychology they call it transference.  If someone commits a good act feels the need to be validated then how good of an act is it really? Just a thought for you.


As had already been stated: Nihilism is VERY different from Atheism. Oh, and the point about 'why don't you just kill yourself" I find pretty fucked up. It also shows your naivety fairly well I feel. I LOVE life. More than you ever could because I believe it is the only one I get, so I'm going to live it to the fullest. Suffering and happiness come in equal measure I think, and you cannot have one without the other. But even at my lowest point I would never consider suicide. It would be a waste of the miracle that is life in this miracle-less universe.

On the flip-side, why don't you just kill yourself so you could be with God. Oh, I know suicide is a sin, but then God forgives doesn't he? You could be with him tomorrow. Why don't you do it?

At this point we are going to have to just disagree. I don't personally believe human life has any particular value. And honestly if you are an person who believe life has no meaning and the logical end is nothingness. Other than the instinct to preserve your life what point is there? That is the logical outcome of Nihilism. Nothingness, Atheists are a starkly different group of people and for the most part very pleasant to be around. You ask why I don't kill myself? Well I am a father so that is a pretty good start. Life is precious and should not be wasted that is a second.  Third I am in no hurry to find out if there is an after life. I am quite content here and have about 60 years life in my natural lifespan that I very much look forward to enjoying.  Happiness / Suffering equation not even touching that again and I was quite stupid to bring it up. Since it is a deeply personal experience and only an individual knows how it applies to them.


So only Christians are 'truly' happy? Do you have any idea how arrogant and preposterous that makes you sound? So the four-point-something BILLION people who don't believe in your personal adult fair tale are only, what? Marginally happy? Partly Happy?

Are are we all actually depressed it's just nobody has told us?

If I cared about sounding arrogant, I don't think I would be posting on this forum.  Christians aren't happy, they are a bunch of miserable people on the whole from what I have seen. People in swingers clubs, now those are some happy people. Drunks, Children are more examples of happy people. But everybody at some point in there life well suffer bouts of depression. That is just normal and part of the human condition.  And no-one is ever 100% happy all of the time unless they are crazy.


What?!? God created Atheists to test the faithful? So you're telling me that God created me the way I am so I'd knock dents in your personal faith? Oh wait! "Not because he forced us to believe but to come in faith." So he doesn't want to force you to believe but he "creates Atheists." So how does he do that without forcing us not to believe? So, here I am, without the supposedly sacred Freewill that you seem to be aloud testing your faith. That's all fine and well, but what about my soul? I go to Hell just 'cause God wanted a few Atheists running about causing trouble for the faithful. Your God sounds like a bit of a dick to me.

LMAO, A bit of a dick, try a massive fucking prick.  Since you like bringing up the Christian god so damn much let me talk about him for a bit. Old Testament, he is running around competing against Samarian, Hitities, Canaanites, Egyptian gods going my children are rebellious. At no point does he claim the other people just the Jewish. He sits there and condemns the faithful and puts them through hell so people will sing his praise. He supposedly creates Lucifer the light bringer as the Angel of Fidelity in order to test the faith. Yea, that is fucking beautiful. Then orders genocide against everyone who does not follow his belief. Welcome to the wonderful world of monotheism. So we move in to the New Testament, which has 4 gospels and 4 different fucking messages. Now how fucked up is that? Mark says "The end of the world is here, repent, repent." and then Matthew says "Follow the law, follow the law, follow the law", you have Luke who says "Ooops we were wrong, so here is how you set up the church and keep your followers." and John who says you all fucked up for taking it literally the kingdom of heaven is already here and the spiritual freedom that comes with practicing the faith.  So lets put it this way, Mark wasn't there. Matthew was, Luke is a liar and John was probably high. So what do we know about him from the new testament, well if Christ was his only son. He willing had him tortured, executed and ridiculed. Oh yea that was part of the plan. Nice going god. I would never submit my child to that and would be quite adamant about inflicting grievous bodily harm to anyone who tried.

 The argument that because science doesn't know everything therefore God exists is VERY flawed logic. Using this logic then the likelihood of God existing 1000yrs ago was greater and his likelihood of him existing 1000yrs from now would be less so. This is known as "God of the gaps" theory amongst theologians. And they stay clear of it. So should you.

But for a moment let's  say that a god-like being (ie. a supernatural creator of existence) does exist. How in the name of the flying spaghetti monster DO YOU KNOW IT IS YOUR GOD? You believe what you believe (I'm assuming here) because that is what your parents taught you to believe. Why are you so sure its the Christian god that exists?

Is it that feeling you get inside when you commune with God? That euphoria that builds up first inside your stomach and makes it way towards you heart? Is that how you KNOW without a single shadow of a doubt that YOU'RE right and everyone else is wrong?

What? You don't think I use to get that when I believed? You don't think the Muslims, Hindus et all get that too? It's a chemical reaction inside your brain, that's all.

First and foremost I do not commune with any god. My faith teaches that prayers fall on empty ears. The only thing you can hope to get is that which you earn for yourself. Through you works and your own merit.  And if there is all powerful being is it my god? Most likely not if I am not mistaken I said that god would be unknowable and unquantifiable. 

Oh yea fyi I consider God and the Universe as the same exact thing.  The fact science does not know everything does not guarantee the existence of a creator. But it also does not remove that possibility. Perhaps you should remember faith requires no justifications. And people will use any means to maintain their beliefs. Including you.




About the The Libertarian Atheist forum

Most Users Ever Online:

13


Currently Online:

doctom

1 Guest

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 11

Topics: 48

Posts: 346

Membership:

There are 48 Members

There has been 1 Guest

There is 1 Admin

There are 2 Moderators

Top Posters:

RestrictedAccess – 28

Kultabugi – 13

upgrade01a – 12

Warren Dew – 12

Homunclus – 11

Aught3 – 11

Administrators: mdr (172 Posts)

Moderators: keddaw (33 Posts), jeffersonianideal (9 Posts)